A Furious Rage.

I abhor this title. A rage indicates fury, rendering the 'furious' description useless.

But obviously, a particular tennis commentator disagrees.

On four distinct occassion in just a mere half HOUR, this man said something along the lines of the title. eg:

"Yes, She's a very good player and to win you need to really beat her."

.. to win... you need to... beat her.... Has the meaning of winning changed to necessitate this addition?

Well sure, I understand that they need to fill in gaps in the game and keep the audience ratings high, but not in this way!

I rank this in my Most Irate Worthy list:

-3rd-

After nonliterary oxymorons and people who write 'then' when they actually mean 'than'.